On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 13:15 -0200, Glauber Costa wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 08:41:56AM +0000, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> qemu-linux:
I believe qemu-user suits better upstream name usage. Other than that,
I think this proposal is sound.
The reason I suggested qemu-linux is because I think QEMU's existing
naming sucks :-)
i.e. system/softmmu == "emulate a full machine" and user == "emulate the
linux kernel ABI"
system vs. linux makes it a little more sense, in my book.
Also, there has been a proposal by ajax in #fedora-devel to have a
"qemu-native"
package, that would install native emu/virt for whatever architecture you're running
at.
What do you guys think of this?
As long it's just a Provides as danpb suggests, I don't mind ...
Cheers,
Mark.