Eucalyptus RPM -- random discussion thread

[graziano obertelli]

On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 01:05:06PM -0500, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Matthew Miller <mattdm at mattdm.org> wrote:
> > Question One:
> >
> > How attached are we to the upstream subpackage names? I'd like of like to
> > change them to more descriptive names:
> 
> If they're from separate tarballs, obviously we'd want to match the
> naming and have them be separate source packages.  If they're just
> subpackages, rename them!  And probably make sure to provide the
> upstream names for compatibility's sake, but I'm a big fan of names
> that are parseable

They are subpacakges: we have a single giant tarball where we build both
the java components (clc, sc and walrus) and the C components (nc, cc and
gl) and the spec file we have reflects that, building everything in one go
but creating multiple packages.

cheers
graziano

> 
> - Jeremy
> _______________________________________________
> cloud mailing list
> cloud at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud

-- 
Graziano Obertelli
Eucalyptus Systems, Inc.

130 Castilian St. Goleta, CA 93117
Office: 805-845-8000
www.eucalyptus.com