Fedora Project: Announcing New Direction
jos at xos.nl
Mon Sep 22 20:42:39 UTC 2003
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 04:28:45PM -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> > Well, as you say, we already have Debian (and many other "truly open"
> > community distributions). We also have many "not completely open"
> > commercial distributions (fill in the names yourself). And we had
> > a (truly?) open commercial distribution: Red Hat Linux. IMHO this
> > is what we seem to loose now: a fully open distribution, but still
> > controlled by a single entity (company). Red Hat Linux played this
> > role, between the community distributions and the not-completely-open
> > commercial distributions. So I still think we *do* loose something.
> Well, you have to define "open" - Red Hat Linux had open source
> licensing, but the devel model for Red Hat Linux was not the open source
Yes, maybe I should better use the phrase "freely available and
freely distributable" here, i.s.o. open, but even this could start
many discussions ;-).
-- Jos Vos <jos at xos.nl>
-- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364
-- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Fax: +31 20 6948204
More information about the devel