f8 gripe#2: why did f8's pm-hibernate regress?

Till Maas opensource at till.name
Wed Jan 2 10:59:12 UTC 2008

On Mi Januar 2 2008, Douglas McClendon wrote:
> Can someone tell me if there is anything I can do to de-regress f8's
> pm-hibernate?

pm-utils hibernation code does not differ much between f7 and f8.

> My analysis is pure speculation based on my understanding of how you can
> tune that behaviour with suspend2(tux-on-ice).  But it is very noticable
> and very annoying and very clearly a f7->f8 change.

I guess it is then a change in the kernel, but afaik the f7 and f8 kernel are 
very similiar, too.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20080102/0ba75cc9/attachment-0002.bin 

More information about the devel mailing list