PolicyKit-authentication-agents in Fedora
mclasen at redhat.com
Thu Apr 8 18:22:47 UTC 2010
On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 14:19 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Apr 2010, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> >>> 3. lxpolkit will be pulled in anyway due to the shortest name.
> >> That's not a useful decision rationale.
> > I never said it is a useful decision rationale, it's something we cannot
> > avoid. I agree it's not useful, but please address your complainants to
> > the yum developers.
> > Let me repeat what I already said in my previous mail: I don't mind
> > polkit-gnome as default agent, but
> > * I'm afraid that yum will choose lxpolkit
> > * I'm afraid polkit-gnome will have more deps in the future
> > * we cannot yet use OnlyShowIn=LXDE
> I'm all ears - tell me another way of how we should know that of 3 items
> one should be chosen over the others?
One interesting criterium might be 'pulls in the least uninstalled
deps'. That would probably handle a lot of cases like the one at hand
More information about the devel