FESCo wants a more sane updates policy (feedback requested)
lists at sapience.com
Sun Feb 28 23:31:53 UTC 2010
On 02/28/2010 06:25 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> drago01 wrote:
>> There has been a draft a while ago which did not result into much
>> discussion ..
>> Which looks pretty sane to me.
> It looks very insane to me:
> * only critical bugfixes, security fixes and hardware enablement for an
> arbitrary class of "system" packages which isn't defined anywhere. Not even
> general bugfixes! IMHO that's not at all what Fedora is or should be about.
> * only weekly pushes. We should target daily pushes. Our current pushes are
Frankly for system packages we have
1) kernel (+perf, dracut grubby)
2) core daemons(e.g. dns, sendmail, nfs)
3) application daemons (e.g. apache, pulseaudio).
Kernel should follow mainline stable - as reasonably soon after
release and our testing as possible.
Core daemons - ditto.
Application Daemons - i have no strong feeling on ..
More information about the devel