Stable Release Updates types proposal (was Re: Fedora Board Meeting Recap 2010-03-11)

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Sat Mar 13 00:35:01 UTC 2010


On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 01:14 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jesse Keating wrote:
> > While it's true that some of our users appreciate the rapid stream of
> > updates, we may have to lose those users, or redirect them to other
> > avenues to rapid updates within the Fedora project and release stream.
> 
> And why would we want to lose a huge number, which appears to be clearly in 
> the majority according to the only approximation to numbers we have, of our 
> current users, just to implement some vision which basically amounts to 
> copying what all the other mainstream distributions do, giving users no 
> choice?
> 
>         Kevin Kofler
> 

There is clearly no reason to continue this conversation with you Kevin.
We are just going to disagree.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100312/52f70fed/attachment.bin 


More information about the devel mailing list