Reasons for hall monitoring
oget.fedora at gmail.com
Tue May 4 21:57:39 UTC 2010
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Camilo Mesias wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 02:45:53PM -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
>>>> This thread is now closed. We've received repeated complaints about the
>>>> redundancy of it.
>>>> No further posts to this thread will be allowed.
> I'm disappointed that the thread is closed when there seems to be an
> issue that isn't resolved.
> Wouldn't it be better to try to focus the discussion rather than
> ignore the issues?
> Call me cynical but I don't see how 'repeated complaints' is
> justification to end a thread. Were there more people complaining than
> those participating? It's very easy to ignore a thread if you think
> it's unimportant.
Apparently, 3 user+2 moderator complaints  are enough to close a thread.
This is quite ironic since the statistics of a poll of 180 real users
were regarded insignificant and biased by the same people.
Anyway, there is not much more to say until the elections. This fact
will be reminded in its glory detail when the time comes.
 statistics taken directly form the person who closed the thread.
More information about the devel