Reasons for hall monitoring
bpepple at fedoraproject.org
Thu May 6 21:46:21 UTC 2010
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 23:22 +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> Dne 6.5.2010 12:28, Karel Zak napsal(a):
> >> Thank you for pointing out yet another undemocratic policy passed by one of
> > +1 The Hall Monitor Policy is cancer.
> +1000 it feels to me like in a bad old Communism when the open debate
> was allowed only when it didn't touch the leading role of the Communist
> Party. I really don't think anybody in this thread said anything so
> sacrilegious that the thread should be terminated.
Normally, I'd be against it killing a thread, but the thread that
started this discussion had already been done awhile back and this new
thread added *nothing* new to the discussion. Frankly, it was more
deserving to be on Slashdot more than the fedora-devel list. The Hall
Monitors were totally justified in killing this one imo, and frankly if
folks want more repetitive flame-bait threads like that I've got zero
interest in staying subscribed to it.
Brian Pepple <bpepple at fedoraproject.org>
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100506/2348dd57/attachment.bin
More information about the devel