Summary/Minutes from today's FESCO meeting (2011-12-12 at 1800 UTC)
ville.skytta at iki.fi
Mon Dec 12 20:47:53 UTC 2011
On 12/12/2011 10:29 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 22:26 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
>> On 12/12/2011 10:16 PM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
>>> There was some discussion a while back about preventing certain
>>> extensions from being uploaded to the lookaside cache. Could ".patch"
>>> be added to that list?
>> Please don't do that. In my opinion the lookaside cache is the proper
>> place for patches for which the Fedora package is not the upstream, for
>> example ones downloaded from web SCM or other URLs.
> This is wrong.
Your opinion may differ, but no, it's not wrong. They're upstream files.
> Patches should never be in the lookaside cache, because
> it is very difficult to view them.
IMO if that'd be a consideration, the lookaside cache shouldn't really
exist at all, everything should be in git instead.
> Patches in git can easily be glanced at in gitweb.
Patches in external URLs can be easily glanced just by accessing the
external URL which is in the specfile.
More information about the devel