what if native systemd service is slower than old sysvinit script?

[Bill Nottingham]

Adam Williamson (awilliam at redhat.com) said: 
> > Well we never had "upstart" (it was just a renamed sysvinit i.e we
> > didn't use any of its parallel startup stuff).
> 
> hum, I thought we were using its ability to parallel start things based
> on LSB deps. oh well. it's certainly *capable* of that, anyway. so
> parallelization is not a systemd win.

upstart can parallelize native upstart services; it doesn't do anything with
sysv/LSB scripts. In upstart, they were launched from /etc/rc.d/rc, just as
before.

Bill