Fedora Workstation product name
drago01 at gmail.com
Wed Nov 6 12:27:01 UTC 2013
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik at redhat.com> wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 11:25:18AM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>> > The Fedora Workstation effort (not a great name, by the way), is brand
>> It doesn't have to end up with that name, for the record. That's just a
>> working title and indicative of the conversation at Flock. Peter Jones had
>> suggested "Fedora Client", and there were some others as well.
> Can we go one level up - should even Fedora be a name of a product? With
> Server/Workstation/Cloud and other as variants? Or can we treat Fedora as
> a project covering all different products using different names?
> You don't use M*soft Server but W*ows Server produced by that company...
> KDE guys tried this rebranding a long time ago, it never worked very well due
> to miscommunication in the very beginnings (KDE SC...). I was involved in
> discussion at Akademy with many red faces screaming "noo, don't do that, noo"
> but actually it makes sense. And even more sense to productised Fedora...
It kills a well known brand and all marketing efforts of the past. And
the KDE one
didn't really worked in the end everyone just calls it (the desktop) "KDE".
More information about the devel