[Fedora Base Design WG] Committee FESCO approved, next steps

[Stephen Gallagher]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 11/06/2013 09:57 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 15:38:10 +0100, Phil Knirsch
> <pknirsch at redhat.com> wrote:
>> 
>> But i do like the idea of well "Overlap" releases? Where most of
>> the release would stay stable in a sense of API/ABI and we could
>> still bring out a newer release.
> 
> Since we have a system where multiple kernel types can be
> installed, maybe we could use that to have a latest stable kernel
> package and a latest long term support kernel package. This will
> take more kernel team resources and may have some issues if the
> graphics drivers devs want to take advantage of a new feature that
> isn't going to be back ported to stable.

Alternately, maybe this is one of the cases where we leave it to
RHEL/CentOS to cover. For really long-term kernel support, those
groups are much better equipped to resource it than the Fedora kernel
team.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlJ6ZD4ACgkQeiVVYja6o6MveACfbAcNcioMfV4R1cJfu9yu8kXD
lHsAn3WH1RfEfSvFzVEKOjjegYybVxrZ
=JnZM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----