Packages requiring Xorg "BackingStore" "true"
przemek.klosowski at nist.gov
Thu Sep 12 19:30:47 UTC 2013
On 09/11/2013 05:27 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
>> Well, yes, but it ought to work regardless of the xorg.conf setting,
>> because that setting has been effectively hardwired to true for about
>> six years now. I rewrote the backing store implementation to use
>> Composite internally, which is always available, so we just blindly
>> ignore the config setting and give you backing store if you ask for it.
>> There may be bugs, I freely admit, but it's definitely meant to work.
>> If it doesn't it's probably a bug in X and I'll fix it, so hook me up
>> with test packages and I'll take a look.
> I've uploaded an x86_64 rpm here , the srpm is here .
>  http://smani.fedorapeople.org/xfoil-6.97-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
>  http://smani.fedorapeople.org/xfoil-6.97-1.fc21.src.rpm
>  http://smani.fedorapeople.org/Naca63412.dat
I compiled the RPM from your source on F19/x86_64 with an Xeon E3-1200
v2/3rd Gen using the intel driver (Ivybridge GT2). As ajax was saying,
the window exposes work just fine: I can raise other windows on top of
xfoil and when I re-expose xfoil it redraws properly.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the devel