Packages requiring Xorg "BackingStore" "true"

[Przemek Klosowski]

On 09/11/2013 05:27 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
>
>> Well, yes, but it ought to work regardless of the xorg.conf setting,
>> because that setting has been effectively hardwired to true for about
>> six years now.  I rewrote the backing store implementation to use
>> Composite internally, which is always available, so we just blindly
>> ignore the config setting and give you backing store if you ask for it.
>> There may be bugs, I freely admit, but it's definitely meant to work.
>> If it doesn't it's probably a bug in X and I'll fix it, so hook me up
>> with test packages and I'll take a look.
> I've uploaded an x86_64 rpm here [1], the srpm is here [2].
...
> [1] http://smani.fedorapeople.org/xfoil-6.97-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
> [2] http://smani.fedorapeople.org/xfoil-6.97-1.fc21.src.rpm
> [3] http://smani.fedorapeople.org/Naca63412.dat
I compiled the RPM from your source on F19/x86_64 with an Xeon E3-1200 
v2/3rd Gen using the intel driver (Ivybridge GT2). As ajax was saying, 
the window exposes work just fine: I can raise other windows on top of 
xfoil and when I re-expose xfoil it redraws properly.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20130912/ff5e5fdb/attachment.html>