abrt Bugzilla summary
kzak at redhat.com
Mon Sep 16 08:36:41 UTC 2013
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 10:38:41AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 17:35:20 +0200
> Jakub Filak <jfilak at redhat.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> > a bugzilla ticket  requiring a better Bugzilla summary field text
> > produced by abrt has been filed. Before I start changing the bug
> > summary format I'd like to do a little survey:
> > What would you like see in the bug summaries produced by abrt?
> I actually disagree with the reporter of the bug.
> I prefer to have the component name in the subject of the bug. It's
> true that you can look this up by going to the bug on the web and that
> it's in the initial email, but after that the context of update emails
> is not there, so it's harder for me to know _which_ of the many abrt
> bugs this is.
Please, fix/improve your email client UI. All bugzilla emails
contain all necessary information in email header:
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Component: util-linux <----- !
X-Bugzilla-Who: rolf at rolffokkens.nl
X-BeenThere: bugzilla at redhat.com
For example if you use mutt then all you need is to add
unignore X-Bugzilla-Product X-Bugzilla-Component
to your .muttrc.
It's pretty common that we don't have component name in BZ summary...
Karel Zak <kzak at redhat.com>
More information about the devel