Packages without the Rawhide branch?

Kevin Fenzi kevin at scrye.com
Wed Jan 28 21:10:43 UTC 2015


On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 20:48:02 +0100
Matěj Cepl <mcepl at cepl.eu> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> this is a question which I have encountered couple of times, but 
> I have always forgot to ask about it: is it possible to have 
> a package without Rawhide (devel) branch?

Nope. 

> I have just created (and got approved) python-mako1.0 as 
> a compatibility package for EPEL-6. When I asked for the new 
> repo for it, I expect to get also devel/Rawhide branch for it.  
> However, I don't see any purpose of it. Should I just orphan the 
> devel branch of it? Or is there a way how to get a package 
> without it in the first place? Shouldn't it be possible?

Yes, just retire and add a dead.package the devel branch. 

There's no better way to do this currently.

kevin


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20150128/4af203b6/attachment.sig>


More information about the devel mailing list