Packages without the Rawhide branch?
Kevin Fenzi
kevin at scrye.com
Wed Jan 28 21:10:43 UTC 2015
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 20:48:02 +0100
Matěj Cepl <mcepl at cepl.eu> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is a question which I have encountered couple of times, but
> I have always forgot to ask about it: is it possible to have
> a package without Rawhide (devel) branch?
Nope.
> I have just created (and got approved) python-mako1.0 as
> a compatibility package for EPEL-6. When I asked for the new
> repo for it, I expect to get also devel/Rawhide branch for it.
> However, I don't see any purpose of it. Should I just orphan the
> devel branch of it? Or is there a way how to get a package
> without it in the first place? Shouldn't it be possible?
Yes, just retire and add a dead.package the devel branch.
There's no better way to do this currently.
kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20150128/4af203b6/attachment.sig>
More information about the devel
mailing list