[Fwd: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux]

[Eric Christensen]

I wanted to pass this along to the group for discussion.  There is a
proposal to allow Publican to use it's naming schema in Fedora.  This
would mean that each document has 

-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: bugzilla at redhat.com
To: eric at christensenplace.us
Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security
guide for Linux
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:30:37 -0400

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471





--- Comment #65 from Michael Hideo <mhideo at redhat.com>  2009-03-30 00:30:34 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #64)
> Thanks, Spot, 
> 
> That makes sense! I can see how it all coalesces and fits together in my head.
> 
> Eric, do you want to draft a policy for submission or would you like me to do
> it. I can have it done by Monday for your review if you like.
> 

Josh has taken this on and drafted:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Publican_Documentation_Packages

He has integrated it into the FPC agenda.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/DraftsTodo

For your review. Thank you, Josh.

- Mike

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/attachments/20090330/5745cb57/attachment.bin