[FAmSCo] Is FAmSCo really dead?

[Truong Anh Tuan]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 02/13/2016 03:35 AM, Giannis Konstantinidis wrote:
> 
> subject says everything. Is FAmSCo really dead?
> 
> As you may have noticed, the last two weekly meetings did not take
> place as we didn't reach quorum. We have not yet voted
> for/appointed a chair, although this should have happened during
> the very first meetings. Even worse, there are FAmSCo members who
> rarely participate in meetings or discussions that take place.
> 
> Just because there have been plans for FOSCo, that doesn't mean
> that the current FAmSCo members will have a passive role.
> 
> The community has trusted and voted for us to be their
> representatives. Let's not forget that.
> 
> All FAmSCo members, please respond below.

Sorry, I could not attend the last meeting. I am in holidays for the
Lunar New Year (I marked as "on vacation" in Fedocal as usual).
I can do it normally from the next week.

Btw, IRC meeting is not the only way for FAmSCo members to get
connected (although it is one of the most important ones). We can
still use other channel (mailing list, tickets...) for lazy consensus
decisions as well as other discussions.

- -- 
Rgds,
Tuan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iEYEARECAAYFAla+rAUACgkQG2XGBe+NUL8tRQCfbSl/9a0Mz8KkcxA8UiOdUXw1
6o4An1e6MHLtPMSNRXJu9skNo9cp5AcK
=8PdC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----