[Bug 209906] Review Request: elektra - A key/value pair database to store software configurations

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: elektra -  A key/value pair database to store software configurations


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209906





------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr  2006-10-15 06:41 EST -------
I don't think the potential conflicts are a sufficient reason
to do things differently than upstream, reporting is enough
in my opinion. I don't think that it is up to the packager to 
check the warnings, reporting is enough, especially when the 
warnings may be innocuous.

I have split out the static libraries in another sub-package in the
new version:
http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/elektra.spec
http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/elektra-0.6.4-2.src.rpm

The rpmlint warning and errors seems acceptable to me, the last 3
are linked with -static not being recognized by rpmlint:

W: elektra conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/profile.d/elektraenv.sh
W: elektra symlink-should-be-relative /usr/lib/elektra/libelektratools.so
/usr/lib/libelektratools.so.1
E: elektra-static devel-dependency elektra-devel
W: elektra-static no-documentation
W: elektra-static devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libelektra.a


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.