[Fedora-suds-list] My Slackness

[Daniel Rodriguez]

Just like Joshua I think that some extra time can be given to get an
important feature polished.

I am happily working with 0.3.9 and I think so far suds is covering the
needs of most users (leaving apart those who are looking for things that
suds can't provide like writing a service, for example)

As I opened a couple of tickets for enhancements (with patches included) I
would like to know your view on such changes making it to 0.4

   - Asynchrounous usage of suds (312)
   - Exception improvement by having a general SudsError and deriving all
   exceptions from there (310). I see someone opened 324 reporting some base
   "Exceptions" being launched which I can confirm
   - Transport with gzip support (311 and 318)


Best regards

Daniel

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 18:15, Joshua J. Kugler <joshua at eeinternet.com>wrote:

> On Friday 18 June 2010, Jeff Ortel elucidated thus:
> > The 0.4 release is mostly ready to go out but I'm not completely
> > happy with the 'plugins' API.  I can either release as is with the
> > caveat that it /may/ change.  Or, I can wait and get it the way I
> > want it first.
>
> Since the plugin feature is going to be a "big deal," I would lean
> toward getting it right.  You certainly want it to be well thought out,
> clean, and easy to use.  Releasing a poorly implemented feature gives a
> project a bad reputation, and maybe worse: give the feature a bad
> reputation, which means it will be used less or not at all.
>
> We'll wait.  I'd rather have a feature that works well than one I have
> to hack around to get it to do what I want.
>
> j
>
> --
> Joshua Kugler
> Part-Time System Admin/Programmer
> http://www.eeinternet.com
> PGP Key: http://pgp.mit.edu/  ID 0x73B13B6A
> _______________________________________________
> suds mailing list
> suds at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/suds
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/suds/attachments/20100623/951803ac/attachment.html