Moving away from reporting to RH bugzilla and adopting pure upstream reporting mantra.
jik at kamens.us
Tue Sep 24 03:10:21 UTC 2013
On 09/23/2013 10:03 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 09/24/2013 01:45 AM, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
>> This absolutely does not scale from a POV of a user reporting bugs.
> Well neither does it do so from developer standpoint that also has to
> maintain downstream distribution bugzilla accounts.
> Basically the amount of work and the effort are on par for both
> parties as in reporter has to file multiple reports against multiple
> package and the developer has to deal with multiple reports against
> multiple distribution in multiple downstreams etc. so arguing one has
> to do more work then the other is a mute point at least as far as I
> see it.
It's really not the same at all. Not nearly.
First of all, the developers are experienced power users for whom
maintaining bugzilla accounts, if they really need to do that, is not
nearly as big a deal as it is for end users who are neither developers
nor power users.
Second, upstream developers can participate in the distribution bug
databases if they feel like it, but it's hardly required. When a
distribution package maintainer reports a bug upstream, the developer
only has to deal with the bug in his own bug database. Whereas if Fedora
bugzilla goes away, every end user /must/ deal with multiple bug
databases to report package bugs to the right place.
Third, there are, I hope, several more orders of magnitude of users than
there are upstream developers, and there are at least two orders of
magnitude more developers than their are distributions. Therefore, in
terms of the total amount of work done, all the developers creating
accounts on all the distributions' bug databases, even if they do feel
compelled to do that, is far, far less work overall than all the users
who report bugs having to figure out how to report bugs for hundreds of
different packages and create accounts on many different bug sites.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the test