desc and summary
goeran at uddeborg.se
Tue May 17 09:01:55 UTC 2005
Bernd Groh writes:
> We thought we'd split summaries and descriptions, to make the files a
> little smaller, and allow to prioritize between the two.
There are points in that. And I want to encourage any attempts to
bring these translations alive again.
But separating description and summary has one disadvantage:
consistency. When I do the translation, I try to keep these two
messages fit together. In the current dist file it's very easy; they
typically come immediately after each other.
The dist package IS very large, I'm very well aware of that. But
maybe splitting it in this way is not ideal. I don't know what the
infrastructure you are building would allow. But if possible, it
might be better to divide by group, or maybe just alphabetically by
Do you other specspo/dist/summary/description translators agree with
More information about the trans