Flash on 64 bit systems (was Re: Firefox 4 repo)
jd1008 at gmail.com
Mon Jul 19 16:43:33 UTC 2010
On 07/19/2010 01:18 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Monday 19 July 2010 01:01 AM, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
>>> Would you say use of noscript or flashblock would be a good compromise?
>>>> If not what are my other options? (maybe I should start a new thread for
>>>> this discussion)
>> I think FlashBlock would be a fairly good compromise. If you're using
>> FlashBlock, you can safely wander around the web knowing that no flash you
>> do not explicitly authorize will be running. As for NoScript, I'm not sure
>> that it adds value for this specific issue, but I certainly run it anyway
>> (and not for security reasons).
> Thanks for your opinion Chris. Much appreciated. :)
I had noscript installed but it broke several websites, including youtube.
Several links in youtube would cease to work. I could no longer play
Perhaps I misconfigured it???
More information about the users