Separate /usr partition

[Gabriel Ramirez]

On 04/12/2011 04:50 AM, Mike McCarty wrote:
> Gabriel Ramirez wrote:
>> So the inconvenients of separate /usr will be apply to separate /var
>> /var/log and /var/tmp ???
>
> I suppose it depends upon what kinds of rules get written by the
> distros and end users for udev. It seems unlikely that actual binaries
> in /bin and /sbin would be made to depend upon anything in /var.

well the existing rules works just fine in my F14 systems, but sometimes 
the unlikely get developed and the likely well is forgotten, so that's 
my reason to ask about the situation with /var

>> and I don't need 3G,
>> I have good Audio after some fight and filing a bug
>> d-bus, print and plug&  play works fine
>>
>> these things works now in my F14 systems, so really new versions
>> (incompatible with separate partitions) were developed for F15 ??
>
> The article is written in somewhat an overdone tone. There is no
> necessity, as I mentioned, that "major parts of /usr be moved into /"
> as it states. They want to make a point, and not all of the argument
> they present is actually realistic.
>
> It certainly would take some serious thought and some real work
> to fix things now, I believe. One could argue that the thought and
> work should have been beforehand, but the attitude I thought I
> detected was one of extreme reluctance even to consider revisiting
> the decisions which have beem made, let alone to take any action
> on them.

Well, the article points the problems are daemon's fault, but maybe the 
clean design of systemd is too clean

Gabriel