autoqa-devel April 2010

autoqa-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org

7 participants
65 discussions

[AutoQA] #125: initscripts: Choosing the right repo for dependencies
by fedora-badges 10 Oct '11

10 Oct '11

#125: initscripts: Choosing the right repo for dependencies -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Reporter: kparal | Owner: jskladan Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: tests | Version: 1.0 Keywords: initscripts | -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Currently after new Koji build the initscripts test downloads all relevant binary packages (related to the particular source package) and installs them. But the RPM dependencies are installed from stable/updates repos, not from Koji. Also the dependencies parsed out of Makefile are installed from stable/updates repos. We have to inquire a little more into this situation. Is it sufficient/desirable? Or is it desirable to download dependencies from updates-testing or bleeding edge Koji? May the initscripts test sometimes fail because of insufficient dependencies are in stable/updates repos? This also depends on cases when we are going to use initscripts test. If it will be used with Bodhi hook, it will be probably easier to solve it than when used with Koji hook. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/125> AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org> Automated QA project

1 2

[AutoQA] #102: post-iso-build hook
by fedora-badges 03 Aug '11

03 Aug '11

#102: post-iso-build hook ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Reporter: wwoods | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Automate installation test plan Component: watchers | Version: 1.0 Keywords: | ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- We need one (or more) standard locations where new iso images get posted for testing, and a watcher that can monitor for new iso images and launch appropriate installation/sanity tests. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/102> AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org> Automated QA project

1 3

[AutoQA] #149: rpmlint: Provide whitelisting of messages
by fedora-badges 28 Jul '11

28 Jul '11

#149: rpmlint: Provide whitelisting of messages --------------------+------------------------------------------------------- Reporter: kparal | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Package update tests Component: tests | Version: 1.0 Keywords: | --------------------+------------------------------------------------------- We need to provide some whitelisting capability of rpmlint packages, so the package maintainers can mark some messages as invalid. We will also probably want to mark some messages as invalid by default for the whole Fedora project. As an interesting inspiration, look at lintian project (validation of deb packages). It provides some "overrides" on a package basis, you just create a definition file in /etc/lintian/package_name or kind of. I have the feeling that rpmlint provides something similar, but we need to discover it more properly. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/149> AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org> Automated QA project

1 2

[AutoQA] #104: virtguest.py: accept iso image(s) as install location
by fedora-badges 21 Jul '11

21 Jul '11

#104: virtguest.py: accept iso image(s) as install location --------------------+------------------------------------------------------- Reporter: wwoods | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Automate installation test plan Component: tests | Version: 1.0 Keywords: | --------------------+------------------------------------------------------- allow {{{VirtGuest.create()}}} to use an iso image (or images) for its {{{location}}} arg, and automatically choose the appropriate {{{--location URL}}} or {{{--cdrom IMAGE}}} flag. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/104> AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org> Automated QA project

1 3

[AutoQA] #150: "artificial ignorance": suppress errors and warnings that aren't important
by fedora-badges 16 Nov '10

16 Nov '10

#150: "artificial ignorance": suppress errors and warnings that aren't important -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Reporter: dmalcolm | Owner: Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Package Sanity Tests Component: tests | Version: 1.0 Keywords: | -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- There are some interesting ideas in here about suppressing a logfile to show up the information that's truly important: http://www.ranum.com/security/computer_security/papers/ai/index.html I think that the rpmlint test needs to have a set of filters, and should suppress output matching certain patterns. For example https://fedorahosted.org/pipermail/autoqa-results/2010-April/013903.html shows: {{{ gnome-python2-gnome.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) libgnome -> lib gnome, lib-gnome, cognomen }}} i.e. it's complaining about a reference to "libgnome" within gnome- python2-gnome, which is clearly a false-positive. For this case we might have a python filtering process that says something like this (caveat: untested): {{{ patterns = [ ": W: spelling-error \S+ libgnome .*", ] def should_ignore(line): for pat in patterns # May want to precompile the patterns: m = re.match(pat, line) if m: return True # No match: return False for line in rpmlint_output if not should_ignore(line): print(line) }}} and then gradually grow patterns. The idea is to make it nice and lightweight, and Fedora QA can then easily take ownership of the suppresssions, without having to get patches into rpmlint. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/150> AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org> Automated QA project

1 4

[AutoQA] #138: ResultsDB: media wiki as a storage for metadata about tests
by fedora-badges 13 Oct '10

13 Oct '10

#138: ResultsDB: media wiki as a storage for metadata about tests ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Reporter: jskladan | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Resultdb Component: infrastructure | Version: 1.0 Keywords: | ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Once #135 #136 and #137 are finished, we should create a provider/middle man (probably a library) which will allow us to get information about the respective test and use it for test execution/storing results/displaying results via frontends... -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/138> AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org> Automated QA project

1 2

[AutoQA] #137: ResultsDB: propose structure for storing metadata about tests on wiki
by fedora-badges 13 Oct '10

13 Oct '10

#137: ResultsDB: propose structure for storing metadata about tests on wiki -----------------------+---------------------------------------------------- Reporter: jskladan | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Resultdb Component: docs/wiki | Version: 1.0 Keywords: | -----------------------+---------------------------------------------------- We want to use mediawiki as a storage for tests metadata. We should agree on the fields we want to store (e.g. test owner, destructive/non- destructive, average time to complete test etc.) and the format we'll use to store it (probably JSON though). -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/137> AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org> Automated QA project

1 3

[AutoQA] #134: ResultsDB: create resultsdb prototype
by fedora-badges 06 Oct '10

06 Oct '10

#134: ResultsDB: create resultsdb prototype ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Reporter: jskladan | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Resultdb Component: tests | Version: 1.0 Keywords: | ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Create prototype of database and software which will implement dbSchema from #133 and API from #131 This prototype should also include some test suite, which will be used to determine, if all the functionality is OK. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/134> AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org> Automated QA project

1 1

[AutoQA] #123: rpmguard: check upgrade paths between releases
by fedora-badges 31 Aug '10

31 Aug '10

#123: rpmguard: check upgrade paths between releases ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Reporter: wwoods | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: tests | Version: 1.0 Keywords: rpmguard | ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- (As pointed out by spot on the devel list: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-March/131746.html) We should be emitting warning/error messages if the new package(s) have a higher ENVR than the currently-released package(s) in any newer release. For example, right now a new F11 package should be checked against the corresponding package(s) in the current F12, branched F13, and rawhide repos. This involves a lot of extra repos and metadata, though. It's not a trivial thing to add. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/123> AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org> Automated QA project

1 14

[AutoQA] #111: depcheck test
by fedora-badges 27 Aug '10

27 Aug '10

#111: depcheck test --------------------+------------------------------------------------------- Reporter: wwoods | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: autoqa depcheck Component: tests | Version: 1.0 Keywords: | --------------------+------------------------------------------------------- Write an actual depcheck test. This test should take, as inputs: * one or more new package builds, and * the name of a target repository for the new build(s) The test should examine the PRCO (provides/requires/conflicts/obsoletes) data for the new package(s) and the PRCO data for the target repository (and all its parent repos). The test should fail if the new builds would cause missing/broken dependencies or unresolveable conflicts in the target repo(s). -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/111> AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org> Automated QA project

1 8

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

autoqa-devel April 2010