Re: 2011-05-04 AutoQA Discussion Minutes
On 05/05/2011 12:51 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
> It's not done but I will finish the initial pages later today
or
> tomorrow and start creating more tickets to reflect our discussion
> today.
>
> Feedback on formatting and/or usefullness would be appreciated.
I would probably do it as a subsection of
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/AutoQA_Roadmap because we can all
subscribe to those pages' changes, as opposed trac wiki pages. Just
an idea.
I figured that the trac wiki was a better place for it since it's AutoQA
development specific and unlikely to be of much interest to other
people. My feeling is that more fedorahosted projects (ie [1], [2]) put
development information in their Trac wiki instead of mediawiki but I
could be wrong here.
I don't feel strongly enough about putting it in trac to fight the group
about it, though. If we want this in mw, I can move it.
[1] https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/
[2] https://fedorahosted.org/fas/
Also, I wouldn't duplicate the list of tickets under Progress
section, because it is bound to be outdated all the time. The always
current list is available as:
https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/milestone/0.5.0 (and clicking on
Closed and Active tickets links)
Actually, that is a Trac wiki macro that lists the tickets instead of a
list of tickets typed out by hand. It's functionally the same as looking
at the milestone and updated without any extra work on our part.
Newer versions of Trac allow for more formatting on the ticket queries
https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/wiki/Planning050logFormatting
"Pretty" log - the output linked to from bodhi, designed for
maintainers Will contain highlights and the first 1000 or so lines of
log output
My idea was to attach only link to the full log, not the first 1000
lines. We can also do that, but I think it would fail the objective
to have the pretty log short and concise.
OK, I misunderstood. Will fix if you haven't already.
Tim
Attachments:
- signature.asc (application/pgp-signature — 553 bytes)