> I would probably do it as a subsection of
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/AutoQA_Roadmap because we can all
> subscribe to those pages' changes, as opposed trac wiki pages. Just
> an idea.
I figured that the trac wiki was a better place for it since it's
AutoQA
development specific and unlikely to be of much interest to other
people. My feeling is that more fedorahosted projects (ie [1], [2])
put
development information in their Trac wiki instead of mediawiki but I
could be wrong here.
Your point of view is completely valid. We just can't subscribe for changes. But
let's keep it there, I don't think it's too much important. (And not everyone
is probably such subscriber freak as I am:)).
> Also, I wouldn't duplicate the list of tickets under
Progress
> section, because it is bound to be outdated all the time. The always
> current list is available as:
>
https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/milestone/0.5.0 (and clicking on
> Closed and Active tickets links)
Actually, that is a Trac wiki macro that lists the tickets instead of
a
list of tickets typed out by hand. It's functionally the same as
looking
at the milestone and updated without any extra work on our part.
Gosh, that's good!
/me should have looked at the page source. Nice.