11:56 a.m.
#314: Decrease the volume of 'PASSED' email sent to maintainers from bodhi
--------------------+-------------------------------------------------------
Reporter: tflink | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Hot issues
Component: core | Keywords:
--------------------+-------------------------------------------------------
With the current setup, maintainers are sent an email with every single
comment made by AutoQA.
These emails aren't particularly useful and increase the amount of noise
that maintainers need to filter out.
Find a way to decrease the number of useless emails sent to maintainers.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/314>
AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org>
Automated QA project
4:42 p.m.
#314: Decrease the volume of 'PASSED' email sent to maintainers from bodhi
--------------------+-------------------------------------------------------
Reporter: tflink | Owner: tflink
Type: task | Status: assigned
Priority: major | Milestone: Hot issues
Component: core | Resolution:
Keywords: |
--------------------+-------------------------------------------------------
Changes (by tflink):
* owner: => tflink
* status: new => assigned
Comment:
lmacken made changes in bodhi and python-fedora to support email-less
comments:
*
https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/changeset/88d39aac30319c2a2c6c3f2632aa76d4...
* https://fedorahosted.org/python-fedora/changeset/devel%2C691
We need to change bodhi_utils to make "PASSED" comments like:
{{{
#!python
bodhi.comment(update, comment, karma, Email=False)
}}}
I'll get a patch written and once the packages are pushed to updates-
testing, send out a call for karma so we can get this rolled out.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/314#comment:1>
AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org>
Automated QA project
2:15 a.m.
#314: Decrease the volume of 'PASSED' email sent to maintainers from bodhi
--------------------+-------------------------------------------------------
Reporter: tflink | Owner: tflink
Type: task | Status: assigned
Priority: major | Milestone: Hot issues
Component: core | Resolution:
Keywords: |
--------------------+-------------------------------------------------------
Comment (by tflink):
Review request created:
* https://fedorahosted.org/reviewboard/r/142/
Keep in mind that this code won't be valid until we get a new build of
python-fedora. If anyone notices the build, feel free to send out a
request for testing. I suppose that we could test with the package from
updates-testing, though.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/314#comment:2>
AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org>
Automated QA project
3:18 a.m.
#314: Decrease the volume of 'PASSED' email sent to maintainers from bodhi
--------------------+-------------------------------------------------------
Reporter: tflink | Owner: tflink
Type: task | Status: assigned
Priority: major | Milestone: 0.5.0
Component: core | Resolution:
Keywords: |
--------------------+-------------------------------------------------------
Changes (by timn):
* cc: timn (added)
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/314#comment:4>
AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org>
Automated QA project
10:45 a.m.
#314: Decrease the volume of 'PASSED' email sent to maintainers from bodhi
--------------------+-------------------------------------------------------
Reporter: tflink | Owner: tflink
Type: task | Status: assigned
Priority: major | Milestone: 0.5.0
Component: core | Resolution:
Keywords: |
--------------------+-------------------------------------------------------
Comment (by tflink):
As Kamil mentioned in an email thread, the solution I proposed here is way
too simplistic and would cause more problems than it would solve. This is
going to require a little more thought before implementing. Review request
discarded.
Conversation on autoqa-devel (split due to the month change):
* https://fedorahosted.org/pipermail/autoqa-devel/2011-April/002133.html
* https://fedorahosted.org/pipermail/autoqa-devel/2011-May/002139.html
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/314#comment:5>
AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org>
Automated QA project
3:14 p.m.
#314: Decrease the volume of 'PASSED' email sent to maintainers from bodhi
--------------------+-------------------------------------------------------
Reporter: tflink | Owner: tflink
Type: task | Status: assigned
Priority: major | Milestone: 0.5.0
Component: core | Resolution:
Keywords: |
--------------------+-------------------------------------------------------
Old description:
With the current setup, maintainers are sent an email with every
single
comment made by AutoQA.
These emails aren't particularly useful and increase the amount of noise
that maintainers need to filter out.
Find a way to decrease the number of useless emails sent to maintainers.
New description:
With the current setup, maintainers are sent an email with every single
comment made by AutoQA.
These emails aren't particularly useful and increase the amount of noise
that maintainers need to filter out.
Find a way to decrease the number of useless emails sent to maintainers.
A full feature description can be found on [wiki:Planning05xEmailReduction
the associated planning wiki page]
Comment (by tflink):
I pushed up an initial pass at code to reduce the number of emails sent by
AutoQA through bodhi. The code and associated tests are in the tflink
branch - df3d9cb12df3f6324eb9c7d9005c5eb7a6263f02
The code is by no means complete, there are some duplication issues and
nothing is configurable yet. However, I want to give people a chance to
review and comment on the way I'm doing this before I get any farther.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/314#comment:6>
AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org>
Automated QA project
8:21 p.m.
#314: Decrease the volume of 'PASSED' email sent to maintainers from bodhi
--------------------+-------------------------------------------------------
Reporter: tflink | Owner: tflink
Type: task | Status: assigned
Priority: major | Milestone: 0.5.0
Component: core | Resolution:
Keywords: |
--------------------+-------------------------------------------------------
Comment (by tflink):
I updated the code in the tflink branch to support configuration and to
have better support for 32 bit results. I haven't tested it a whole lot
yet due to the difficulty in doing so but I'm planning to do more testing
before we release. I also haven't updated from master yet. I figured that
could happen when it gets merged with the other features.
Commit with changes: 82cf7ce3dbefcafff82b8fe860dfce22efda93c0
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/314#comment:7>
AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org>
Automated QA project
10:57 a.m.
#314: Decrease the volume of 'PASSED' email sent to maintainers from bodhi
--------------------+-------------------------------------------------------
Reporter: tflink | Owner: tflink
Type: task | Status: closed
Priority: major | Milestone: 0.5.0
Component: core | Resolution: fixed
Keywords: |
--------------------+-------------------------------------------------------
Changes (by tflink):
* status: assigned => closed
* resolution: => fixed
Comment:
Code has been reviewed and pushed to master:
613fa26bf144e2c90146344c686cd01eeeca1939
Testing will start when we get all the 0.5.0 features pushed to master.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/314#comment:8>
AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org>
Automated QA project
4:04 a.m.
#314: Decrease the volume of 'PASSED' email sent to maintainers from bodhi
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: tflink | Owner: tflink
Type: task | Status: reopened
Priority: major | Milestone: 0.5.0
Component: documentation | Resolution:
Keywords: |
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Changes (by kparal):
* status: closed => reopened
* resolution: fixed =>
* component: core => documentation
Comment:
Maybe this ticket will require some wiki doc adjustments. Changing to
documentation component until we do that.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/314#comment:9>
AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org>
Automated QA project
7:24 p.m.
#314: Decrease the volume of 'PASSED' email sent to maintainers from bodhi
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: tflink | Owner: tflink
Type: task | Status: reopened
Priority: major | Milestone: 0.5.0
Component: documentation | Resolution:
Keywords: |
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Comment (by tflink):
Added documentation about configuration settings to the trac wiki. This
documentation can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/wiki/autoqaconf
I don't think that much else would need to be documented. If there are
other things, let me know otherwise I will close this ticket soon.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/314#comment:10>
AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org>
Automated QA project
5:49 a.m.
#314: Decrease the volume of 'PASSED' email sent to maintainers from bodhi
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: tflink | Owner: tflink
Type: task | Status: reopened
Priority: major | Milestone: 0.5.0
Component: documentation | Resolution:
Keywords: |
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Comment (by kparal):
Great job, I just have a few comments:
1. Do we want to have two separate autoqa.conf documentation places? The
first is inside the file itself, the second is online. I am kind of
reluctant to maintain it at two places, I don't see the benefit. OTOH I
understand that our wiki allows us to express some ideas better - like the
two tables you created, they are great.
2. The new page should be linked from somewhere, otherwise only a handful
of people would find it.
I would propose following:
a) Let's keep as much as possible of our documentation inside autoqa.conf.
Let's document online only those options that need very detailed
explanation or for which a plain text format is not sufficient.
b) Let's link the extended documentation directly from autoqa.conf (put a
hyperlink in the first few lines of that file).
We should also think about fpo wiki and trac wiki. Do we want to have all
of our documentation at one place, or do we have some system of splitting
up content, or are we fine with having it randomly distributed?
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/314#comment:11>
AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org>
Automated QA project
9:09 a.m.
#314: Decrease the volume of 'PASSED' email sent to maintainers from bodhi
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: tflink | Owner: tflink
Type: task | Status: reopened
Priority: major | Milestone: 0.5.0
Component: documentation | Resolution:
Keywords: |
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Comment (by tflink):
Replying to [comment:11 kparal]:
1. Do we want to have two separate autoqa.conf documentation places?
The
first is inside the file itself, the second is online. I am kind of
reluctant to maintain it at two places, I don't see the benefit. OTOH I
understand that our wiki allows us to express some ideas better - like the
two tables you created, they are great.
No, I don't think that we do. The duplication occurred to me while I was
writing it but figured that this would work for now.
2. The new page should be linked from somewhere, otherwise only a
handful of people would find it.
I would propose following:
a) Let's keep as much as possible of our documentation inside
autoqa.conf. Let's document online only those options that need very
detailed explanation or for which a plain text format is not sufficient.
b) Let's link the extended documentation directly from autoqa.conf (put
a hyperlink in the first few lines of that file).
OK, that makes sense. Expand upon the examples and what a 'state change'
is on the wiki page but otherwise keep the docs in the comments for the
conf file.
We should also think about fpo wiki and trac wiki. Do we want to
have
all of our documentation at one place, or do we have some system of
splitting up content, or are we fine with having it randomly distributed?
Agreed but I also think that's a conversation for autoqa-devel.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/314#comment:12>
AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org>
Automated QA project
11:24 a.m.
#314: Decrease the volume of 'PASSED' email sent to maintainers from bodhi
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: tflink | Owner: tflink
Type: task | Status: reopened
Priority: major | Milestone: 0.5.0
Component: documentation | Resolution:
Keywords: |
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Comment (by tflink):
I updated the [wiki:autoqaconf configuration page in the trac wiki] to do
more than just duplicate the comments in autoqa.conf.
I also added links to that page in autoqa.conf
* 1ed5906019cde47fdf4c0939c1f58e84a06a96dc
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/314#comment:13>
AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org>
Automated QA project
12:11 p.m.
#314: Decrease the volume of 'PASSED' email sent to maintainers from bodhi
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: tflink | Owner: tflink
Type: task | Status: reopened
Priority: major | Milestone: 0.5.0
Component: documentation | Resolution:
Keywords: |
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Comment (by jlaska):
Replying to [comment:13 tflink]:
I updated the [wiki:autoqaconf configuration page in the trac wiki]
to
do more than just duplicate the comments in autoqa.conf.
Ooh good stuff! I like the examples. I made some minor table tweaks on
the wiki doc in the hopes to make it slightly more readable. Feel free to
adjust/revert as desired.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/314#comment:14>
AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org>
Automated QA project
7:41 a.m.
#314: Decrease the volume of 'PASSED' email sent to maintainers from bodhi
--------------------+-------------------------------------------------------
Reporter: tflink | Owner: tflink
Type: task | Status: closed
Priority: major | Milestone: 0.5.0
Component: core | Resolution: fixed
Keywords: |
--------------------+-------------------------------------------------------
Changes (by kparal):
* status: reopened => closed
* resolution: => fixed
* component: documentation => core
Comment:
I think this ticket can be closed. Any objections?
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/314#comment:15>
AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org>
Automated QA project
4687
days inactive
4747
days old
autoqa-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
14 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
fedora-badges