Re: [AutoQA] #110: rpmlint, rpmguard: Send results to mailing list

[Kamil Paral]

----- "James Laska" <jlaska(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:

>  On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 12:44 -0500, James Laska wrote:
>  > On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 08:48 -0500, James Laska wrote:
>  > > > James, will you install the updated code to our test server so
>  > > > we can see it in action, 
>  > > 
>  > > Certainly, I can build and install the autoqa package from git
>  head to
>  > > the autotest client systems.  There are a few other patches out
>  for
>  > > review on the list ... do we want those included? 
>  > 
>  > autoqa-0.3-3 tagged [1] and been deployed.
>  
>  It doesn't appear that rpmguard tests are being scheduled alongside
>  rpmlint tests.  I think one issue I saw was that the version of
>  autotest
>  we're using might not have the utf8 fix that you sent upstream.   
No, there was no utf-8 fix sent upstream, it was just an internal change
(line #63 in autoqa file). I have sent another patch upstream, but it was
not related to this.

I will try to have a look what could be wrong. It's interesting that
there is (only) one result in the list.

[AutoQA] #110: rpmlint, rpmguard: Send results to mailing list

[James Laska]

On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 03:41 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote:
>  ----- "James Laska" <jlaska(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>  
>  > On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 12:44 -0500, James Laska wrote:
>  > > On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 08:48 -0500, James Laska wrote:
>  > > > > James, will you install the updated code to our test server so
>  > > > > we can see it in action, 
>  > > > 
>  > > > Certainly, I can build and install the autoqa package from git
>  > head to
>  > > > the autotest client systems.  There are a few other patches out
>  > for
>  > > > review on the list ... do we want those included? 
>  > > 
>  > > autoqa-0.3-3 tagged [1] and been deployed.
>  > 
>  > It doesn't appear that rpmguard tests are being scheduled alongside
>  > rpmlint tests.  I think one issue I saw was that the version of
>  > autotest
>  > we're using might not have the utf8 fix that you sent upstream.  
>  
>  No, there was no utf-8 fix sent upstream, it was just an internal change
>  (line #63 in autoqa file). I have sent another patch upstream, but it was
>  not related to this.
>  
>  I will try to have a look what could be wrong. It's interesting that
>  there is (only) one result in the list. 
That one rpmguard test result [1] is from when I manually scheduled the
job on the command-line using the 'atest' command.  I also modified all
site_tests/rpmguard/* files to remove the '' character in your name.  I
have a suspicion that autotest might not handle that well
(http://pastie.org/777826).

Any thoughts?

Thanks,
James

[1]
https://fedorahosted.org/pipermail/autoqa-results/2010-January/002944.html