Dropping i386 arch from koji.katello.org

[Lukas Zapletal]

Hello all,

we are having troubles with free space on koji.katello.org and the
easiest way of resolving this is not adding more space but rather
dropping i386 external repositories (Fedora, EPEL, RHEL).

Foreman and Katello do not build against this arch and I suppose the
same for Pulp and Candlepin.

Please confirm and we are good to go, thanks.

[jesus rodriguez]

On 08/28/2014 09:27 AM, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> we are having troubles with free space on koji.katello.org and the
> easiest way of resolving this is not adding more space but rather
> dropping i386 external repositories (Fedora, EPEL, RHEL).
>
> Foreman and Katello do not build against this arch and I suppose the
> same for Pulp and Candlepin.
>
> Please confirm and we are good to go, thanks.

+1
Candlepin would probably run in i386, but we really don't focus on it.

[Pulp-list] Dropping i386 arch from koji.katello.org

[Barnaby Court]

Hi, Dropping i386 would be a problem for Pulp.  We currently support i386 for RHEL 5.

-Barnaby

----- Original Message -----
From: "Lukas Zapletal" 
To: [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail]
Cc: "Jan Blazek" 
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 9:27:56 AM
Subject: [Pulp-list] Dropping i386 arch from koji.katello.org

Hello all,

we are having troubles with free space on koji.katello.org and the
easiest way of resolving this is not adding more space but rather
dropping i386 external repositories (Fedora, EPEL, RHEL).

Foreman and Katello do not build against this arch and I suppose the
same for Pulp and Candlepin.

Please confirm and we are good to go, thanks.

[Pulp-list] Dropping i386 arch from koji.katello.org

[Brian Bouterse]

Is it difficult to add more space to koji.katello.org? I'm trying to determine if its a matter of cost, or if there is technical complexity.

-Brian

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Lukas Zapletal" 
> To: [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail]
> Cc: "Jan Blazek" 
> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 9:27:56 AM
> Subject: [Pulp-list] Dropping i386 arch from koji.katello.org
>
> Hello all,
>
> we are having troubles with free space on koji.katello.org and the
> easiest way of resolving this is not adding more space but rather
> dropping i386 external repositories (Fedora, EPEL, RHEL).
>
> Foreman and Katello do not build against this arch and I suppose the
> same for Pulp and Candlepin.
>
> Please confirm and we are good to go, thanks.
>
> --
> Later,
>  Lukas #lzap Zapletal
>
> Pulp-list mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list

[Pulp-list] Dropping i386 arch from koji.katello.org

[Mike McCune]

it is non trivial but can be done, there is also cost as well.

50% of the storage on the box is for i386 external repositories needed 
to support the builds (200+GB out of 360GB).  We can keep them if they 
are required but it looked like a quick win if it was something we 
didn't need.

Mike

On 08/28/2014 08:19 AM, Brian Bouterse wrote:
> Is it difficult to add more space to koji.katello.org? I'm trying to determine if its a matter of cost, or if there is technical complexity.
>
> -Brian
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Lukas Zapletal" 
> > To: [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail]
> > Cc: "Jan Blazek" 
> > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 9:27:56 AM
> > Subject: [Pulp-list] Dropping i386 arch from koji.katello.org
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > we are having troubles with free space on koji.katello.org and the
> > easiest way of resolving this is not adding more space but rather
> > dropping i386 external repositories (Fedora, EPEL, RHEL).
> >
> > Foreman and Katello do not build against this arch and I suppose the
> > same for Pulp and Candlepin.
> >
> > Please confirm and we are good to go, thanks.
> >
> > --
> > Later,
> >   Lukas #lzap Zapletal
> >
> > Pulp-list mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
>
> Pulp-list mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list

[Pulp-list] Dropping i386 arch from koji.katello.org

[Barnaby Court]

I believe the only platform Pulp is actively supporting i386 for is RHEL 5.  If we are maintaining i386 repositories for platforms other than RHEL 5 I we can get rid of them from Pulp's perspective.

-Barnaby

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike McCune" 
To: "Brian Bouterse" , "Lukas Zapletal" 
Cc: [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail], "Jan Blazek" 
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 11:34:03 AM
Subject: Re: [Pulp-list] Dropping i386 arch from koji.katello.org

it is non trivial but can be done, there is also cost as well.

50% of the storage on the box is for i386 external repositories needed 
to support the builds (200+GB out of 360GB).  We can keep them if they 
are required but it looked like a quick win if it was something we 
didn't need.

Mike

On 08/28/2014 08:19 AM, Brian Bouterse wrote:
> Is it difficult to add more space to koji.katello.org? I'm trying to determine if its a matter of cost, or if there is technical complexity.
>
> -Brian
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Lukas Zapletal" 
> > To: [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail]
> > Cc: "Jan Blazek" 
> > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 9:27:56 AM
> > Subject: [Pulp-list] Dropping i386 arch from koji.katello.org
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > we are having troubles with free space on koji.katello.org and the
> > easiest way of resolving this is not adding more space but rather
> > dropping i386 external repositories (Fedora, EPEL, RHEL).
> >
> > Foreman and Katello do not build against this arch and I suppose the
> > same for Pulp and Candlepin.
> >
> > Please confirm and we are good to go, thanks.
> >
> > --
> > Later,
> >   Lukas #lzap Zapletal
> >
> > Pulp-list mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
>
> Pulp-list mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list

[Pulp-list] Dropping i386 arch from koji.katello.org

[Mike McCune]

excellent, we have f19-i386 which is eating up 90+GB.

Lukas, should we just ... delete it?

On 08/28/2014 08:50 AM, Barnaby Court wrote:
> I believe the only platform Pulp is actively supporting i386 for is RHEL 5.  If we are maintaining i386 repositories for platforms other than RHEL 5 I we can get rid of them from Pulp's perspective.
>
> -Barnaby
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike McCune" 
> To: "Brian Bouterse" , "Lukas Zapletal" 
> Cc: [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail], "Jan Blazek" 
> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 11:34:03 AM
> Subject: Re: [Pulp-list] Dropping i386 arch from koji.katello.org
>
> it is non trivial but can be done, there is also cost as well.
>
> 50% of the storage on the box is for i386 external repositories needed
> to support the builds (200+GB out of 360GB).  We can keep them if they
> are required but it looked like a quick win if it was something we
> didn't need.
>
> Mike
>
> On 08/28/2014 08:19 AM, Brian Bouterse wrote:
> > Is it difficult to add more space to koji.katello.org? I'm trying to determine if its a matter of cost, or if there is technical complexity.
> >
> > -Brian
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Lukas Zapletal" 
> > > To: [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail]
> > > Cc: "Jan Blazek" 
> > > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 9:27:56 AM
> > > Subject: [Pulp-list] Dropping i386 arch from koji.katello.org
> > >
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > we are having troubles with free space on koji.katello.org and the
> > > easiest way of resolving this is not adding more space but rather
> > > dropping i386 external repositories (Fedora, EPEL, RHEL).
> > >
> > > Foreman and Katello do not build against this arch and I suppose the
> > > same for Pulp and Candlepin.
> > >
> > > Please confirm and we are good to go, thanks.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Later,
> > >    Lukas #lzap Zapletal
> > >
> > > Pulp-list mailing list
> > > [e-mail]
> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
> >
> > Pulp-list mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list

[Pulp-list] Dropping i386 arch from koji.katello.org

[Randy Barlow]

On 08/29/2014 10:12 AM, Mike McCune wrote:
> excellent, we have f19-i386 which is eating up 90+GB.
>
> Lukas, should we just ... delete it?

I am still not convinced that we don't need the 386 builds. I think we
should wait for a major Pulp version to remove them, like 3.0. I don't
believe we are simply copying all the files. For example, we build
mod_wsgi - that is not Python code, it's C.

[Pulp-list] Dropping i386 arch from koji.katello.org

[Barnaby Court]

I agree with Randy,  We need 32bit builds for pulp on F19 and F20.  If you are wanting to remove the F19-i386 repository will the F19-i686 library be maintained?

-Barnaby

----- Original Message -----
From: "Randy Barlow" 
To: "Mike McCune" , "Barnaby Court" 
Cc: [e-mail], [e-mail], "Jan Blazek" , [e-mail]
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2014 11:00:34 AM
Subject: Re: [Pulp-list] Dropping i386 arch from koji.katello.org

On 08/29/2014 10:12 AM, Mike McCune wrote:
> excellent, we have f19-i386 which is eating up 90+GB.
>
> Lukas, should we just ... delete it?

I am still not convinced that we don't need the 386 builds. I think we
should wait for a major Pulp version to remove them, like 3.0. I don't
believe we are simply copying all the files. For example, we build
mod_wsgi - that is not Python code, it's C.

[Pulp-list] Dropping i386 arch from koji.katello.org

[Randy Barlow]

On 08/28/2014 09:27 AM, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
> we are having troubles with free space on koji.katello.org and the
> easiest way of resolving this is not adding more space but rather
> dropping i386 external repositories (Fedora, EPEL, RHEL).
>
> Foreman and Katello do not build against this arch and I suppose the
> same for Pulp and Candlepin.
>
> Please confirm and we are good to go, thanks.

Hello,

Koji is broken for us because the 386 builds were dropped. I don't think
we ever gave the confirmation that this e-mail was requesting, unless I
missed some e-mails (possible). Either way, this is blocking us from
making today's build, so it's very important that we bring these 386
builds back ASAP.

For example, see this build that failed for us today:

http://koji.katello.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=149839

Please bring the 386 targets back and let us know when they are ready
for us to build again. Thanks!

[Pulp-list] Dropping i386 arch from koji.katello.org

[Mike McCune]

On 09/04/2014 09:26 AM, Randy Barlow wrote:
> On 08/28/2014 09:27 AM, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
> > we are having troubles with free space on koji.katello.org and the
> > easiest way of resolving this is not adding more space but rather
> > dropping i386 external repositories (Fedora, EPEL, RHEL).
> >
> > Foreman and Katello do not build against this arch and I suppose the
> > same for Pulp and Candlepin.
> >
> > Please confirm and we are good to go, thanks.
>
> Hello,
>
> Koji is broken for us because the 386 builds were dropped. I don't think
> we ever gave the confirmation that this e-mail was requesting, unless I
> missed some e-mails (possible). Either way, this is blocking us from
> making today's build, so it's very important that we bring these 386
> builds back ASAP.
>
> For example, see this build that failed for us today:
>
> http://koji.katello.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=149839
>
> Please bring the 386 targets back and let us know when they are ready
> for us to build again. Thanks!

I'm restoring the i386 repositories, may take several hours as it is 
~60G of data.

Mike

[foreman-dev] Re: [Pulp-list] Dropping i386 arch from koji.katello.org

[Eric D Helms]

How much space will we have after restoring?
On Sep 4, 2014 6:47 PM, "Mike McCune"  wrote:
> On 09/04/2014 09:26 AM, Randy Barlow wrote:
> > On 08/28/2014 09:27 AM, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
> > > we are having troubles with free space on koji.katello.org and the
> > > easiest way of resolving this is not adding more space but rather
> > > dropping i386 external repositories (Fedora, EPEL, RHEL).
> > >
> > > Foreman and Katello do not build against this arch and I suppose the
> > > same for Pulp and Candlepin.
> > >
> > > Please confirm and we are good to go, thanks.
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Koji is broken for us because the 386 builds were dropped. I don't think
> > we ever gave the confirmation that this e-mail was requesting, unless I
> > missed some e-mails (possible). Either way, this is blocking us from
> > making today's build, so it's very important that we bring these 386
> > builds back ASAP.
> >
> > For example, see this build that failed for us today:
> >
> > http://koji.katello.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=149839
> >
> > Please bring the 386 targets back and let us know when they are ready
> > for us to build again. Thanks!
>
> I'm restoring the i386 repositories, may take several hours as it is ~60G
> of data.
>
> Mike
>
> --
> Mike McCune
> mmccune AT redhat.com
> Red Hat Engineering       | Portland, OR
> Systems Management        | 650-254-4248
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "foreman-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [e-mail].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.