The backlog ( https://fedorahosted.org/candlepin/wiki/BrainBox ) has an item #35 like to have shorter package names which look cool i.e. org.candlepin. This is quite an easy thing to do but should really be done before we make our first release. I'm ok with org.candlepin.
Thoughts?
jesus
On 03/29/2010 11:58 PM, Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote:
The backlog ( https://fedorahosted.org/candlepin/wiki/BrainBox ) has an item #35 like to have shorter package names which look cool i.e. org.candlepin. This is quite an easy thing to do but should really be done before we make our first release. I'm ok with org.candlepin.
Thoughts?
jesus _______________________________________________ candlepin mailing list candlepin@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/candlepin
I have noticed in the maven works that folks are moving towards package names being common names. I would be fine with dropping the org if you like.. candlepin.XXX
-- bk
----- "Bryan Kearney" bkearney@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/29/2010 11:58 PM, Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote:
The backlog ( https://fedorahosted.org/candlepin/wiki/BrainBox )
has
an item #35 like to have shorter package names which look cool i.e. org.candlepin. This is quite an easy thing to do but should really
be
done before we make our first release. I'm ok with org.candlepin.
Thoughts?
Yeah I think the Java convention is that it is your url backwards (never really understood that), so we should do org.candlepin if we are going to register candlepin.org.
jesus _______________________________________________ candlepin mailing list candlepin@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/candlepin
I have noticed in the maven works that folks are moving towards package names being common names. I would be fine with dropping the org if you
like.. candlepin.XXX
-- bk
candlepin mailing list candlepin@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/candlepin
On 03/30/2010 09:28 AM, Justin Harris wrote:
----- "Bryan Kearney"bkearney@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/29/2010 11:58 PM, Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote:
The backlog ( https://fedorahosted.org/candlepin/wiki/BrainBox )
has
an item #35 like to have shorter package names which look cool i.e. org.candlepin. This is quite an easy thing to do but should really
be
done before we make our first release. I'm ok with org.candlepin.
Thoughts?
Yeah I think the Java convention is that it is your url backwards (never really understood that), so we should do org.candlepin if we are going to register candlepin.org.
The rationale is that you own your domain name, so the package names will be globally unique. So com.candlepin and org.candlepin could co-exist in the same process space.
jesus _______________________________________________ candlepin mailing list candlepin@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/candlepin
I have noticed in the maven works that folks are moving towards package names being common names. I would be fine with dropping the org if you
like.. candlepin.XXX
-- bk
candlepin mailing list candlepin@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/candlepin
candlepin mailing list candlepin@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/candlepin
On 03/30/2010 09:52 AM, Adam Young wrote:
On 03/30/2010 09:28 AM, Justin Harris wrote:
----- "Bryan Kearney"bkearney@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/29/2010 11:58 PM, Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote:
The backlog ( https://fedorahosted.org/candlepin/wiki/BrainBox )
has
an item #35 like to have shorter package names which look cool i.e. org.candlepin. This is quite an easy thing to do but should really
be
done before we make our first release. I'm ok with org.candlepin.
Thoughts?
Yeah I think the Java convention is that it is your url backwards (never really understood that), so we should do org.candlepin if we are going to register candlepin.org.
The rationale is that you own your domain name, so the package names will be globally unique. So com.candlepin and org.candlepin could co-exist in the same process space.
Yeah.. but it seems alot of the maven artifacts (commons, hibernate, etc) are moving away from the org.foo.bar hierarchy for the jars.
-- bk
On 03/30/2010 09:59 AM, Bryan Kearney wrote:
On 03/30/2010 09:52 AM, Adam Young wrote:
On 03/30/2010 09:28 AM, Justin Harris wrote:
----- "Bryan Kearney"bkearney@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/29/2010 11:58 PM, Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote:
The backlog ( https://fedorahosted.org/candlepin/wiki/BrainBox )
has
an item #35 like to have shorter package names which look cool i.e. org.candlepin. This is quite an easy thing to do but should really
be
done before we make our first release. I'm ok with org.candlepin.
Thoughts?
Yeah I think the Java convention is that it is your url backwards (never really understood that), so we should do org.candlepin if we are going to register candlepin.org.
The rationale is that you own your domain name, so the package names will be globally unique. So com.candlepin and org.candlepin could co-exist in the same process space.
Yeah.. but it seems alot of the maven artifacts (commons, hibernate, etc) are moving away from the org.foo.bar hierarchy for the jars.
-- bk
I thought it was just the opposite: they started off hat way, but more are in the org... structure. Still that is just the maven name. The java packages still are com. and so on.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 03/30/2010 09:59 AM, Bryan Kearney wrote:
The rationale is that you own your domain name, so the package names will be globally unique. So com.candlepin and org.candlepin could co-exist in the same process space.
Yeah.. but it seems alot of the maven artifacts (commons, hibernate, etc) are moving away from the org.foo.bar hierarchy for the jars.
I'm not talking about the jars, I'm talking about the actual package name i.e. instead of org.fedorahosted.candlepin.model.Consumer it would be org.candlepin.model.Consumer. Honestly I'm fine with the existing one since that's where we are hosting the project. But the backlog seemed to want to change it, so I'm offering up org.candlepin. As far as a release name I'm fine with just candlepin in a <cough>maven</cough> repo.
jesus
- -- jesus m. rodriguez | jesusr@redhat.com principal software engineer | irc: zeus red hat systems management | 919.754.4413 (w) rhce # 805008586930012 | 919.623.0080 (c) +---------------------------------------------+ | "Those who cannot remember the past | | are condemned to repeat it." | | -- George Santayana | +---------------------------------------------+
On 03/30/2010 10:42 AM, Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 03/30/2010 09:59 AM, Bryan Kearney wrote:
The rationale is that you own your domain name, so the package names will be globally unique. So com.candlepin and org.candlepin could co-exist in the same process space.
Yeah.. but it seems alot of the maven artifacts (commons, hibernate, etc) are moving away from the org.foo.bar hierarchy for the jars.
I'm not talking about the jars, I'm talking about the actual package name i.e. instead of org.fedorahosted.candlepin.model.Consumer it would be org.candlepin.model.Consumer. Honestly I'm fine with the existing one since that's where we are hosting the project. But the backlog seemed to want to change it, so I'm offering up org.candlepin. As far as a release name I'm fine with just candlepin in a<cough>maven</cough> repo.
http://candlepin.org/ Owned by Network Solutions. Cybersquatting, but at least they have links to Bowling related stuff.
jesus
jesus m. rodriguez | jesusr@redhat.com principal software engineer | irc: zeus red hat systems management | 919.754.4413 (w) rhce # 805008586930012 | 919.623.0080 (c) +---------------------------------------------+ | "Those who cannot remember the past | | are condemned to repeat it." | | -- George Santayana | +---------------------------------------------+
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkuyDcoACgkQvJZ57YntiYO44QCeLs+J3u7T2fpEvN6lRsLauWGL 2pQAoN6+x8+errRXPeD+X9hfzv+9ZNdX =lwkx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ candlepin mailing list candlepin@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/candlepin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 03/30/2010 11:51 AM, Adam Young wrote:
On 03/30/2010 10:42 AM, Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote: I'm not talking about the jars, I'm talking about the actual package name i.e. instead of org.fedorahosted.candlepin.model.Consumer it would be org.candlepin.model.Consumer. Honestly I'm fine with the existing one since that's where we are hosting the project. But the backlog seemed to want to change it, so I'm offering up org.candlepin. As far as a release name I'm fine with just candlepin in a<cough>maven</cough> repo.
http://candlepin.org/ Owned by Network Solutions. Cybersquatting, but at least they have links to Bowling related stuff.
if we're going with host names, why not leave it as is then. We already own org.fedorahosted.candlepin.
jesus
- -- jesus m. rodriguez | jesusr@redhat.com principal software engineer | irc: zeus red hat systems management | 919.754.4413 (w) rhce # 805008586930012 | 919.623.0080 (c) +---------------------------------------------+ | "Those who cannot remember the past | | are condemned to repeat it." | | -- George Santayana | +---------------------------------------------+
On 03/30/2010 11:57 AM, Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 03/30/2010 11:51 AM, Adam Young wrote:
On 03/30/2010 10:42 AM, Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote: I'm not talking about the jars, I'm talking about the actual package name i.e. instead of org.fedorahosted.candlepin.model.Consumer it would be org.candlepin.model.Consumer. Honestly I'm fine with the existing one since that's where we are hosting the project. But the backlog seemed to want to change it, so I'm offering up org.candlepin. As far as a release name I'm fine with just candlepin in a<cough>maven</cough> repo.
http://candlepin.org/ Owned by Network Solutions. Cybersquatting, but at least they have links to Bowling related stuff.
if we're going with host names, why not leave it as is then. We already own org.fedorahosted.candlepin.
It is sooooo big ;)
org.fh.cp?
-- bk
candlepin@lists.fedorahosted.org
-
Adam Young -
Bryan Kearney -
Jesus M. Rodriguez -
jesus rodriguez -
Justin Harris