----- "Bryan Kearney" <bkearney(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 03/26/2010 09:14 AM, Devan Goodwin wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Bryan Kearney<bkearney(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>> On 03/25/2010 12:46 PM, Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Bryan
Kearney<bkearney(a)redhat.com> wrote:
<SNIP
>
> To me I think we should bite the bullet and ask ourselves the hard
> questions about what data we need to audit. We should solve this
> internally and transparently to the API, and we're then free to
keep
> the API resource oriented and delete's meaning is clear.
OK.. thinking out loud. I think we will want to audit:
1) The satcerts which are assigned to an owner.
2) The owner itself.
3) The consumers for the owner, and the collection of facts.
4) The entitlements which a consumer had.
5) The subscription pools which a consumer had
Forgive the silly question, but it seems like auditing would be event-based, as opposed to
just figuring out what data to pull. Is it that we want to audit any action that affects
these entities?
- Justin
Any other items?
-- bk
_______________________________________________
candlepin mailing list
candlepin(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/candlepin