On 07/21/2010 07:55 AM, Devan Goodwin wrote:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Bryan Kearneybkearney@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/19/2010 11:56 AM, Devan Goodwin wrote:
As before, my opinion is strongly that we are essentially re-inventing variables and namespaces because cuke has chopped out most everything we've ever known about organizing and re-using test code with classes, inheritance, fixtures, methods, and return values. I still can't
Have you or anyone else posted this to any cuke mailing list? Is this the way it is with Cuke, or how we are using it?
-- bk
Got a little feedback in that thread, I do not think it is the way we are using cukes. Surely we could clean some things up but it looks like the core complaints I have are just the way it is.
I am concerned a bit about schedule, and I like the idea of external functional tests. I would be open to changing this if the pain (read time) is not too huge.
-- bk