-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 03/30/2010 09:59 AM, Bryan Kearney wrote:
The rationale is that you own your domain name, so the package names will be globally unique. So com.candlepin and org.candlepin could co-exist in the same process space.
Yeah.. but it seems alot of the maven artifacts (commons, hibernate, etc) are moving away from the org.foo.bar hierarchy for the jars.
I'm not talking about the jars, I'm talking about the actual package name i.e. instead of org.fedorahosted.candlepin.model.Consumer it would be org.candlepin.model.Consumer. Honestly I'm fine with the existing one since that's where we are hosting the project. But the backlog seemed to want to change it, so I'm offering up org.candlepin. As far as a release name I'm fine with just candlepin in a <cough>maven</cough> repo.
jesus
- -- jesus m. rodriguez | jesusr@redhat.com principal software engineer | irc: zeus red hat systems management | 919.754.4413 (w) rhce # 805008586930012 | 919.623.0080 (c) +---------------------------------------------+ | "Those who cannot remember the past | | are condemned to repeat it." | | -- George Santayana | +---------------------------------------------+