----- Original Message -----
On 26 November 2015 at 17:07, Honza Horak <hhorak(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> From my PoV there are still same directions where we want to go with Fedora
> distro -- being more flexible, lowering barriers, etc. Even the Component
> Pipeline is something I see valid for Fedora, maybe just piece of it, not
> whole. But having that, it would be something that would bring the missing
> flexibility.
Right, I still see value in Envs & Stacks as a public discussion forum
to kick around ideas like "How might the Software Component Pipeline
concept be useful to Fedora?". There are a range of folks working on,
or at least interested in, various developer experience and
modularisation related projects that have the potential to influence
Fedora's future direction, so it's good to have a place to be able to
raise those ideas that don't already have a home and ask "Hey, is this
something we think is worth pursuing further?".
However, that "preliminary sounding board" role doesn't require the
formal governance structure we have now - the mailing list and the
space on the wiki are all we need, with one of the things we discuss
being where and how to pitch ideas we decide to pursue.
I totally agree. I also think we should be a group of people that encourages new ideas and
new ways to improve Fedora - and also tries to give guidance and helping hand to those
that come up with the ideas. IOW, if you have a crazy idea and are afraid/unsure what the
broader community would say, come talk to us first and we'll work with you to form a
solid proposal/POC/"marketing strategy" for it.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan(a)gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
--
Regards,
Slavek Kabrda