On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 12:25:29PM -0600, Bernard Johnson wrote:
Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 04:47:35PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>
>>> No, don't put the blame on me (or the FPC or the future), it's your
>>> vote.
>>>
>> You started it and you have to support it if you want people to vote.
>>
>
> No, I didn't start it, it was brought up here by (another) 3rd party
> repo manager. I just recorded the need for voting on it and did my
> part of voting.
>
I don't think thl is being unreasonable here. *Someone* has to support
it. If you consider it to be a big enough issue to warrant a vote, then
you should support it.
There is not nearly enough bandwidth in the group to go out and "look"
for issues. If a 3rd party repo manager has a strong opinion on
repotag, then he should be here supporting his views.
That already happened a month ago and generated lots of discussion on
this list: 22% of this list's traffic ever is about that! And just for
fun with stats: 21% of the traffic was about banning
fedora-usermgr. It is really beaten to death and beyond.
Please check the archives if you weren't subscribed back then.
In lieu of that, if you are wanting a vote, then it should be you.
If I were really a proxy introducing a 3rd party's vote proposal that
the 3rd party couldn't/wouldn't represent itself I would agree, but
the situation is that there *was* already a loadful of discussion
initiated by that person and discussed with that person, only that we
didn't have someone to do the actual decision. Now that we finally
have a decisive EPEL it needs to finish the open issues, not rehash
them for the umpteenth time.
--
Axel.Thimm at
ATrpms.net