Matthias Saou wrote:
Joke aside, I'd like to see which views we have on the release and
update procedure to apply to EPEL.
- Do we want a moving (and potentially breaking) set of packages which
is constantly being updated?
- Do we want a fixed set of packages when a RHEL release is made and
focus on major bugfixes and security updates from there on?
While some folks certainly have an interest in the latter, I think it
wiser to simply focus on the former, at least until we reach a critical
mass of packages/maintainers. At that point, reconsideration would be