On 8/21/07, Karsten Wade <kwade(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 15:05 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> Ok, that just amplifies the point that the information requested below seems
> to be critical prerequisite for inclusion of *any* package in EPEL. Steering
> committee, please process this request with high priority.
>
> > > Is there a complete list of all binary packages included in all RHEL
> > > channels that EPEL should be compatible with available somewhere?
> > > Complete public binary repodatas (just the metadata, not packages) of
> > > binary packages included in them would be nice.
There are a lot of people here with knowledge of how Red Hat works.
Is there an impediment to getting that list?
--
Karsten Wade ^ Fedora Documentation Project
Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. |
fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
quaid.fedorapeople.org | gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
Can someone detail out what information is being looked for? Also,
what channels in RHN would some of this stuff fall under. I think
that tomcat and lots o' other java stuff is in some developer
channels. We'll need to iron the whole thing out.
stahnma