On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 02:57:50AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 03. 08. 21 2:10, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 01:55:52AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I've opened the following two pull requests to introduce %py3_check_import
> > to EPEL8 and EPEL7:
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/epel-rpm-macros/pull-request/31
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/epel-rpm-macros/pull-request/32
> > So far, there has been no response. Is there anybody willing to merge them?
> > They are manually tested, as indicated in the comments.
> > When we introduce new macros to Fedora, I strive to backport them to EPELs
> > if possible, so package maintainers don't need to think "may I use
> > they desire EPEL compatibility. However, I don't want to merge my own pull
> > requests to epel-rpm-macros (unless they are urgent bug fixes).
> I can merge them...
Thank you! Both updates now exist:
I deliberately didn't do the epel8 build because I wanted to wait for:
to get rebased, but ok. ;)
> > A meta question: Should the epel-sig group co-maintain the
> They could if desired.
I think it is desired. Why wouldn't it be?
Beats me. I don't want to speak for the epel-sig without the folks in it
speaking up first. :)