On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 8:45 AM Stephen John Smoogen <smooge(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 1 Mar 2022 at 08:19, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 04:21:56AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 3:07 AM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2058274
> > >
> > > fails to build with:
> > >
> > > DEBUG util.py:444: No matching package to install: 'ocaml-dune >=
1.0'
> > >
> > > This package is in RHEL 9 buildroot (ocaml-dune-2.8.5-5.el9.x86_64).
> > >
> > > I read an earlier thread ("Subject: [EPEL-devel] Re: Packages
> > > disappearing from the EPEL 9 buildroot") and it seems to indicate
that
> > > RHEL 9 buildroot packages aren't going to be available in EPEL 9.
> > > This seems crazy, is it really correct?
> > >
> >
> > It's not crazy. EPEL is intended to build on RHEL content, which means
> > we can't depend on something RHEL doesn't publish. If Red Hat wants to
> > publish their buildroot repo, then sure, we could use it.
>
> I wasn't very clear, but I was addressing my remark at Red Hat.
> There's really no reason why we (Red Hat) don't publish buildroot, in
> fact my personal view is we ought to for open source reasons.
>
I do not think you will find much disagreement here.. but after 3+ years of saying it and
nothing changing, many of us have made our peace.
To be a bit more fair, we have not blindly added all buildroot content
to RHEL. However, we have made progress on coming up with a way to
request these packages be added and worked to help teams internally
understand the implications of this. We continue to add content to
every RHEL minor release.
That's not nothing. It's just not everything.
josh