On 11. 03. 22 10:36, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 11:14:31AM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 11:01:20AM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 10:51:48AM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>> I'll see if we can move the OCaml packages to CRB. It seems to be the
>>> easiest way to fix the original coccinelle build problem.
>>
>> This gets odder. I see from our internal spreadsheet and downloads
>> that some of the ocaml packages are in fact already in CRB for RHEL
>> 9.0, and others are not. We previously requested that all ocaml-*
>> packages be added to CRB.
>>
>> Binary packages which are not in CRB but should be:
>>
>> ocaml-calendar*
>> ocaml-camomile*
>> ocaml-csexp*
>> ocaml-csv*
>> ocaml-curses*
>> ocaml-dune*
>> ocaml-fileutils*
>> ocaml-gettext*
>> ocaml-libvirt*
>> ocaml-source
>> ocaml-xml-light*
>>
>> Do you need a BZ opened to move these packages to CRB?
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2060850
Currently even with this bug fixed we won't be able to build
Coccinelle until RHEL 9.1 is released, which is like 9+ months away.
This (if true) is ridiculous. Is there some other solution?
Given that EPEL 9 now builds against CentOS Stream, this is not necessarily true.
The other solution would have been to include the packages in CRB sooner :D
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok