On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 3:36 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
*this is worth a discussion in todays EPEL Steering Committee Meeting*
It sounds like the epel9-next is going to startup by building against the CS buildroot.
Changing it at this time would cause a delay.
Thus we need to write some "verify build deps are released" checker. I have an
idea of how to do this, so I'm willing to volunteer to write and run something.
But, it would be good to have some discussion to determine if we want to keep using the
CS buildroot for epel9-next, always. Or if we want to use it just as a bootstrap
mechanism, and then switch to building just off the available CentOS Stream repos at some
point.
Thoughts?
Should we always use buildroot? Or just keep up until we're fairly stable?
We should only use the buildroot repo for as long as we need to. The
*sooner* we can switch to the published content, the better.
--
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!