On 9/17/07, Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)tummy.com> wrote:
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Dag Wieers wrote:
>On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
>> Since Enrico never intended to maintain clamav in EPEL, he has
>> formally orphaned clamav in EL-4 and EL-5.
>>
>> Is there anyone out there that would be willing to take it on?
>>
>> Preferably someone who likes/understands Enrico's package setup so
>> you
>> can stay in sync with Fedora versions?
>>
>> If no one steps up soon, I might be able to take it over, but I would
>> be quite likely to radically change the packaging.
>Before you do, let's discuss how we can make things compatible in order
>to help existing users :)
ok. Sorry for getting behind on this...
It doesn't look like anyone wants to step up and maintain the current
package in EPEL.
Actually I would be interested in doing it in the form you mentioned
below. I thought it was moving behind the scenes from the last email
you quoted above. I could be a co-maintainer as I have not maintained
anything to this date.
Would you be interested in maintaining your package in EPEL?
Or failing that, would you be willing to let me use your package and
just keep it in sync with your version upstream?
Obviously, there would need to be testing to confirm that it upgrades
the old 0.88.x version currently in EPEL correctly, but I can work on
that if you don't mind me basing on your package.
Any other thoughts or ideas?
kevin
_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
--
Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator
How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed
in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice"