V Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 09:36:08AM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 11:14:31AM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 11:01:20AM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 10:51:48AM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > I'll see if we can move the OCaml packages to CRB. It seems to be
the
> > > easiest way to fix the original coccinelle build problem.
> >
> > This gets odder. I see from our internal spreadsheet and downloads
> > that some of the ocaml packages are in fact already in CRB for RHEL
> > 9.0, and others are not. We previously requested that all ocaml-*
> > packages be added to CRB.
> >
> > Binary packages which are not in CRB but should be:
> >
> > ocaml-calendar*
> > ocaml-camomile*
> > ocaml-csexp*
> > ocaml-csv*
> > ocaml-curses*
> > ocaml-dune*
> > ocaml-fileutils*
> > ocaml-gettext*
> > ocaml-libvirt*
> > ocaml-source
> > ocaml-xml-light*
> >
> > Do you need a BZ opened to move these packages to CRB?
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2060850
Currently even with this bug fixed we won't be able to build
Coccinelle until RHEL 9.1 is released, which is like 9+ months away.
This (if true) is ridiculous. Is there some other solution?
That's not ridiculous. That's a release cadence of RHEL.
Maybe you could use EPEL 9 Next which is based on CentOS Stream 9. There is
the change already visible
<
http://mirror.stream.centos.org/9-stream/CRB/x86_64/os/Packages/>. However,
I'm not sure whether EPEL 9 Next is still a thing.
-- Petr