On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 6:01 AM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 10:51:48AM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I'll see if we can move the OCaml packages to CRB. It seems to be the
> easiest way to fix the original coccinelle build problem.
This gets odder. I see from our internal spreadsheet and downloads
that some of the ocaml packages are in fact already in CRB for RHEL
9.0, and others are not. We previously requested that all ocaml-*
packages be added to CRB.
Binary packages which are not in CRB but should be:
ocaml-calendar*
ocaml-camomile*
ocaml-csexp*
ocaml-csv*
ocaml-curses*
ocaml-dune*
ocaml-fileutils*
ocaml-gettext*
ocaml-libvirt*
ocaml-source
ocaml-xml-light*
Do you need a BZ opened to move these packages to CRB?
(Insert here my monthly request that there be a single source of truth
about packages.)
If you already had a ACKed BZ/Jira for these, you can probably
reference that and make the necessary merge requests to comps[1] and
pungi[2].
[1]:
https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/release-engineering/comps
[2]:
https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/release-engineering/pungi-centos
--
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!