On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Jesse Keating <jkeating(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 12:55 -0600, Michael Stahnke wrote:
>
> I completely agree. I thought we did keep 1 version back, but perhaps
> I am wrong on that.
> +1 on making this an official stance for keeping at minimum 1 previous version.
>
> Is this difficult to change from a technical perspective?
Yes, you'd need significant changes in mash to support this, or you'd
need to write a post-mash utility that merged the new tree and parts of
the old tree together, potentially re-making repodata. It is not a
simple/easy task.
So is the feature that inode0 is seeing a side-effect of koji usage
versus plague (eg it worked when we were using plague but it changed
when we went to koji?) I am not looking to go back to plague.. but
wanting to pin down why/when the change occurred.
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
Ah, but a man's reach should exceed his grasp. Or what's a heaven for?
-- Robert Browning