Well.this is just a plugin?
If so,Ithink so.
Best Regards,
Christopher Meng------'Cicku'
My personal blog is
http://cicku.me,hope you can visit and say
something about it.
More Contact info see here:http://about.me/cicku
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:04:18PM -0700, Stephen John Smoogen
wrote:
> On 20 January 2012 11:12, Russell Golden <niveusluna(a)www.niveusluna.org>
wrote:
> > I maintain mozilla-https-everywhere, and upstream is going to release
> > version 2.0 soon. I hope. Anyway. If 2.0's only changes are new
> > supported sites, would it be acceptable to push it to EPEL, or should
> > I just use the repo I already have on repos.fedorapeople.org? If
> > indeed the only change is new rulesets, backporting would make the
> > resulting package 1.x in name only.
>
> I think this would be ok.
>
+1
_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list