Well.this is just a plugin? If so,Ithink so.
Best Regards, Christopher Meng------'Cicku'
My personal blog is http://cicku.me,hope you can visit and say something about it. More Contact info see here:http://about.me/cicku
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Toshio Kuratomi a.badger@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:04:18PM -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 20 January 2012 11:12, Russell Golden niveusluna@www.niveusluna.org wrote:
I maintain mozilla-https-everywhere, and upstream is going to release version 2.0 soon. I hope. Anyway. If 2.0's only changes are new supported sites, would it be acceptable to push it to EPEL, or should I just use the repo I already have on repos.fedorapeople.org? If indeed the only change is new rulesets, backporting would make the resulting package 1.x in name only.
I think this would be ok.
+1
epel-devel-list mailing list epel-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list