On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 5:37 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 17. 03. 23 0:08, Troy Dawson wrote:
> This package has been considered important enough to Red Hat's customers that
> Red Hat has decided to promote it to be an official part of RHEL.
I know I am late to the party, so feel free to ignore me.
Is it OK to claim guessed reasons for new packages being added to RHEL?
I could think of other reasons as well. E.g. it's not important for customers
but it's important for Red Hat. Or maybe it is a not-so-important dependency of
something else.
Does Red Hat have any other motivation with RHEL other than a customer
needing the functionality? Those other reasons are generally driven by
someone needing it.
What I am trying to say, wouldn't it be generally more accurate
to simply state:
"Red Hat has decided to promote this package to be an official part of RHEL."
?
This feels cold, which I think is why Troy was trying to add more color here.
--
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!