On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 01:26:59AM +0300, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
> On 08/26/2008 01:16 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 12:10:14AM +0400, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
>>
>>> Seriously speaking, the main difficulty in maintaining packages, is
>>> the total absence of feedback from users *before* any updates.
>>>
>>
>> Well yes, that is the problem. I'm aware of a number of OCaml / EPEL
>> users. They mainly seem to be people using it to teach university
>> courses ...
>>
>> Rich.
>>
> Maybe you could leave the older ocaml as such and create a new ocaml5 ?
That's another possibility. But I've never seen a working parallel
OCaml compiler install. It's definitely not as easy as it is with gcc
to do parallel / compat installs ... A question for upstream, I
think.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many
powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc.
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top
_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
I know we have at least 1 app ( maybe more) that would work a lot
better with the newer version, (like it would build). I'll vote for
the update.
stahnma