On 14.10.2008 20:03, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 14.10.2008 17:49, Patrice Dumas wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:51:33PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
database all the maintainers that maintain at least one EL branch. I'll mail Toshio to ask whether it is possible. And the text on this page should certainly be shortened.
Toshio kindly answered me. Currently there is no url that can be used for that, but he did a simple script to get that information.
The script is here: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/pkgdb/id_to_owner.py
The result is here: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/pkgdb/epel-owner.txt
/me takes a quick look.
The list contains corsepiu, which according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/ContributorStatusNo doesn't want to be a EPEL Contributer
He's listed as owner for perl-Test-Taint and perl-Params-Validate in EPEL-4.
Ahh, that explains it.
I was unable to track down the request for the EPEL branches in bugzilla (they aren't on the review request) but I do see that rmyers is the owner of the EL-5 branches.
I remember that corsepiu once accidentally was assigned as owner for a few epel packages. Maybe that (without purpose) was not fixed properly?
Perhaps he wants the EL-4 branches as well?
Rob CCed.
and according to https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugzilla?tg_format=plain is not maintaining any packages in EPEL directly. Maybe he's co-maintainer somewhere to make sure he sees commits, but the script did not catch that.
This is actually because of how bugzilla works combined with the way we create that set of acls. For Fedora, the devel owner is used to determine who to use as owner in bugzilla. For EPEL, the EL-5 owner is used.
Ahh, that explains it. Thx for tracking this down.
Cu knurd